http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52283
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-16
17:01:53 UTC ---
I'd say you should (when not pedantic) just attempt to handle TREE_NO_WARNING
nops in the case handling code, as if the nops weren't there.
I hope we'll eventually extend TREE_NO_WARNING to be a bit that thise tree
should be looked up in some hash table on what warnings should be suppressed on
it, so that TREE_NO_WARNING does only disable warnings that it wants to.
