http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52241
--- Comment #20 from Vladimir Yakovlev <vbyakovl23 at gmail dot com> 2012-02-20 18:04:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > Nice, so we want Paolo's patch. Out of interest, what are the 447.deal > numbers > when comparing linking against old (pre-Benjamin's commit) libstdc++.a and > current libstdc++.a with Paolo's patch (or libstdc++.so.6, i.e. without > -static)? Runspec numbers (as runspec prints) for both static and dynamic Static Base: Old: 447.dealII 11440 324 35.3 * New: 447.dealII 11440 302 37.9 * Peak: Old: 447.dealII 11440 285 40.2 * New: 447.dealII 11440 268 42.6 * Dynamic Base: Old: 447.dealII 11440 327 34.9 * New: 447.dealII 11440 327 35.0 * Peak: Old: 447.dealII 11440 287 39.9 S New: 447.dealII 11440 288 39.7 * So, no effect in dynamic case. Is it right?