http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52433
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-01 09:35:41 UTC --- Ah yes, thanks for the link. (In reply to comment #7) > Joke aside: Would it be useful to connect this issue with CWG 1402? I think you just did, with that link :) I'm still going to add move ops to the _Safe_iterator class template because if the P/R of 1402 is accepted the change is unlikely to be applied to the older release branches
