http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52522
Bug #: 52522 Summary: Overloaded functions called with initializer lists considered ambiguous Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: dgstef...@numerica.us Consider: #include <vector> using std::vector; class Matrix{}; class Vector{}; Matrix horizontalConcat(const std::vector<Vector>& vectors); Matrix horizontalConcat(const std::vector<Matrix>& matrices); int main() { Matrix a,b; horizontalConcat({a,b}); } GCC 4.4 and 4.5 in C++0X mode (E.G., g++ testA.cpp -c -ansi -std=c++0x ) accept this code and do the right thing. However, 4.6.3 produces: /usr/local/compilers/4.6/bin/g++ testA.cpp -c -ansi -std=c++0x estA.cpp: In function ‘int main()’: testA.cpp:25:24: error: call of overloaded ‘horizontalConcat(<brace-enclosed initializer list>)’ is ambiguous testA.cpp:25:24: note: candidates are: testA.cpp:12:8: note: Matrix horizontalConcat(const std::vector<Vector>&) testA.cpp:13:8: note: Matrix horizontalConcat(const std::vector<Matrix>&) However, sending an initializer list containing 3 or more Matrices works fine. Also, removing the vector<Vector> overloaded function removes the warning. In principle there could be some ambiguity, when using an initializer list of two elements, between calling vector's initializer list ctor or calling one of its other ctors, but here I don't see that either, since vector<Matrix> doesn't have a ctor that takes two matrices. At any rate, either GCC 4.6 is incorrectly concluding that the function call is ambiguous, or it's producing a very confusing error message. Thanks very much.