http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-02 
10:12:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)

> following code is based on artihmetic overflow assumption (after overflow we
> gen <0 number on x86 and x86_64):

Bad assumption, overflow is undefined behaviour.

The bug submission form asys to read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ before reporting
bugs, which says if your code works as you expect with -fwrapv then it's not a
bug in the compiler, it's a bug in your code.

Reply via email to