http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48518
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-04 11:15:54 UTC --- Clang appears to agree with GCC now. This reminds me of PR 46824
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48518
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-04 11:15:54 UTC --- Clang appears to agree with GCC now. This reminds me of PR 46824