http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #25 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-12 08:24:16 UTC --- If we make an ABI switch at some point, should we move over to relying just on atomics and the libatomic fallbacks (assuming/hoping libatomic exists by then)? Also, refcounting in basic_string has bugs too. Do you see other areas of libstdc++ that could use a review of the synchronization bits?