http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #27089|0 |1
is obsolete| |
Attachment #27093|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #49 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-13
22:59:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 27155
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27155
fix overload carets
The patch that I am currently bootstrapping. I made a small change to the
output. It looks like this now:
caret-overload.C:102:6: error: no matching function for call to ‘f(int)’
f(1);
^
note: candidates are:
caret-overload.C:1:6: note: void f()
note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided
void f();
^
caret-overload.C:10:6: note: void f(int, int)
note: candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
void f(int,int);
^
But if you don't like it, I can switch off the DI_HIDE_PREFIX for the failure
reason. Note that the notes without prefix will be perfectly aligned with the
previous message.
