http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43772

--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-28 
12:49:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> 
> Except that this version would warn for x<INT_MIN && x>INT_MAX, whereas this
> belongs to other warnings. So testing the triviality of the first ranges seems
> best.

I don't understand. This warning (whatever its name) should precisely warn for
that with "logical 'and' of mutually exclusive tests is always false".

Reply via email to