http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352

--- Comment #7 from Meador Inge <meadori at codesourcery dot com> 2012-05-17 
20:31:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> There is no call to 'foo' in the test case here.  I guess you meant 'bar', but
> even so executable test cases are strongly preferred over manual inspection of
> assembly code.

Yup, 'bar'.  Sorry.

> FWIW, using the test case in the gcc-patches submission I've reproduced the 
> bug
> with both gcc-4.6.3 and gcc-4.5.3 on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi.

Thanks for checking that out.

Reply via email to