http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
--- Comment #7 from Meador Inge <meadori at codesourcery dot com> 2012-05-17 20:31:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > There is no call to 'foo' in the test case here. I guess you meant 'bar', but > even so executable test cases are strongly preferred over manual inspection of > assembly code. Yup, 'bar'. Sorry. > FWIW, using the test case in the gcc-patches submission I've reproduced the > bug > with both gcc-4.6.3 and gcc-4.5.3 on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi. Thanks for checking that out.