http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53524
--- Comment #17 from Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com> 2012-05-31 21:08:51 UTC --- > In any case I recommend not mixing together here different issues: > the first one, subject of this report, is overeager warning in open > enum context with conditional operators (I understand that by now > we agree that the warning is behaving as designed, only it seems > sensible to have a way to at least controlling it, cmp C front end, > EDG); the second one is about speculative defects in the way the > C++ front end handles enumerated types. For the latter we need > testcases in Bugzilla, actually a separate PR should be opened. I think this bug report is on how the C++ front end handles enums. Its test case is very focussed on the problem. The other test cases WRT this error message seem to be working correctly. So, I think any new PR should be an RFE for the warning option.
