http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53899

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-09 
14:45:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The lockfree code is invalid anyway because 
> boost::lockfree::detail::tagged_ptr
> doesn't have a trivial default constructor, so it can't be used with
> std::atomic

Actually ignore that part - I misread the spec.

Reply via email to