http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53946

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-12 
23:48:57 UTC ---
>this is how musl libc defines it.

Then there is a mismatch between musl libc and GCC.  GCC and glibc define it to
be long on x86_64.

Also musl libc is not currently supported as a target for GCC, there are some
changes needed to be made to GCC to support it fully.

Reply via email to