http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53949
--- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-17 23:04:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Kaz, do you think it is safe to assume that SR.S = 0 at function entry? I think so. I can't imagine a practical system with setting SR.S to one in its start-up code, though I'm wrong about it.
