http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #70 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-07-30 08:43:09 UTC --- On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 > > --- Comment #69 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-28 > 09:46:00 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #63) > > With a (seemingly) unrelated patch (attached to PR52097) I'm back on ICEing > > for the gfortran.dg/lto/pr45586*.f90 testcases ... > > > > Even before the adjusted type merging we have (at compile-time) > > > [...] > > > > _BUT_(!) its main-variant is > > > [...] > > > > thus has a restrict-qualified data field. That's bogus as TYPE_FIELDS > > is supposed to be shared amongst variant types. > > So, is this a fortran front-end bug, a middle-end bug, or a lto bug ? > (Hint: PR 51765 is a marked as a lto bug ;-) ) It's a frontend bug.
