http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #2 from Paul H. Hargrove <PHHargrove at lbl dot gov> 2012-08-18
02:38:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (Note, apparent s/4.2.1/4.1.2/g in initial description.)
Correct, I am sorry about that.
> I'd suggest updating to just a later gcc build, if you can find *only slightly
> newer* rpm:s; as for a x86_64-linux F 8 with gcc-4.1.2-33 ("gcc (GCC) 4.1.2
> 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)"), I'm well into stage 1 for r190498.
I already have a 4.5.1 on that system and am well past the previous failure
point by using it. I'll see how old I can go after that build is complete.
-Paul
