http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180
Denis Kolesnik <lirex.software at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #17 from Denis Kolesnik <lirex.software at gmail dot com> 2012-08-18 21:28:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > Also, you declare SQL_date_begin[10] then fill it with 11 characters > (YYYY-MM-DD plus the numm terminator) and do the same with SQL_date_end > > This is horrible, horrible code and should be deleted immediately. > > (In reply to comment #5) > > it should work without problems, because of programming language syntax > > which > > is a standart. > > But it works so, that SQL1 partially overwrites value of SQL_date_begin and > > values are > > not such as expected. > > Please check the standard before arguing about it. The C standard states that > for the functions in <string.h> "If an array is accessed beyond the end of an > object, the behavior is undefined." > > To understand undefined behaviour see: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undefined_behavior > > > > I never heard, that the "C" language is outdated. The "C++" is just another > > standart which includes > > the syntax of "C". > > Noone said it's outdated, what on earth are you talking about? > > > So I consider it is as an GCC error which should be fixed, also because all > > standart libraries > > come along with GCC. > > No, the strcat and strcpy functions come from the C library provided by your > OS, they do not come from GCC. If you still believe there is a bug then maybe > you should report it to Microsoft instead. thank you for understandable answer!