http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487
--- Comment #19 from davidxl at google dot com 2012-09-11 17:44:29 UTC --- How much saving do we get by not writing out the 0 entries? With the proposed change, how less frequent is the problem occuring? David On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohn...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:29 AM, hjl.tools at gmail dot com > <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487 >> >> --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2012-09-11 >> 17:29:15 UTC --- >> Thanks for looking into it. This is a long standing problem. >> I have seen random profiledbootstrap failures for a long time. > > Thanks for confirming that this has happened prior. Unfortunately the > addition of the histogram is likely making this more frequent, due to > the changing summary sizes after merging. One way to deal with this > for now might be to write all histogram entries (even the 0 ones) into > the summary to keep the size static. > > Honza, what do you think? > > Teresa > >> >> -- >> Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email >> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- >> You are on the CC list for the bug. > > > > -- > Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohn...@google.com | 408-460-2413
