http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54726
Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2012-09-27 19:25:49 UTC --- Bug fixed. The libbacktrace library is very small compared to GCC as a whole. I really don't think it's worth adding yet another configuration option, one that ideally would be tested but in practice would simply bitrot, merely to save the time it takes to compile 8 C files, 6 of which are very short. There are currently only 5824 lines of C code in the entire libbacktrace library. I really can't accept that compiling those files is a significant time penalty for somebody who is already building all of GCC.