http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> 2012-10-04 19:40:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > > > I assume you do see improvements with -O3 -fwhole-program? (it improves > > > the > > > scores in my setup, I would be curious to see how it compares to other > > > numbers > > > you report) > > > > Yes, with -O3 -fwhole-program I get: > > Time spent in iteration: 6.34161 > > > > (With -fprofile-use -Ofast -march=native: > > Time spent in iteration: 2.75908 ) > > Hmm, interesting. Fixing the current resolution bug should get -flto and > -fwhole-program scores equivalent, but obviously there is a lot room for > improvement - I did not see so much preivously. > > How does text size compare with > clang lto/non-lto 1003656/1332016 > gcc whole-program/non-whole-program? 1518688/1722480/(1873392(-flto))
