http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54868
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-11 09:57:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Have a look at vect.exp: there are specific naming conventions for > testcases that control how they are compiled. Gah, you are right, thanks. I wish the testsuite weren't that complicated, with funny different rules in every sub-directory... I am tempted to create a new subdirectory (with its own .exp file) for generic vector tests that are not vectorizer tests. A directory where things like dg-require-effective-target vect_double would actually do what they say... But check_vect_support_and_set_flags is still not ideal, on x86 it uses -msse2 and I'd rather have either -mavx2 (compile-only) or whatever the machine supports (likely at least -msse4 these days). I'll see if just renaming the testcase in the vect directory is enough for this testcase.
