http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #40 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-11-15 13:46:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #39) > I agree with Kostya that no major changes to mach_override are necessary > because we are really going to dump it. However minor fixes required for ASan > in GCC to work on Darwin right now should be perfectly ok. > > As there currently are issues blocking the dynamic ASan runtime (e.g. > https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=124), and we > still > depend on CoreFoundation I can't promise that we'll get rid of mach_override > before the GCC 4.8 release. Now that you have committed the patch from comment 29 to upstream compiler-rt... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121112/155989.html can we at least get missing mach_override/mach_override.h and mach_override/mach_override.c files imported into the asan branch, if not gcc trunk, as well as the approved patch from... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01119.html so that we can start building libsanitizer on intel darwin? Thanks in advance for any help on these issues.
