http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55359
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2012-11-19 CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, | |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-19 11:40:05 UTC --- Caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192741 lowpart_bit_field_p looks weird, I don't see how BITS_PER_WORD is relevant there, what IMHO matters is whether the subreg is valid or not. While the first hunk that uses this function uses validate_subreg, the second one doesn't and attempts to create an invalid subreg (subreg:V2DF (reg:OI) 8), where the byte offset is not a multiple of V2DFmode size.