http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55518



--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-28 
17:23:32 UTC ---

I still think it is a very bad idea.  As I said earlier, there are lots of

similar compiler options that require their corresponding runtime libraries,

and adding lots of junk to each *.exp just because user might use those options

in RUNTESTFLAGS is overkill.

Reply via email to