http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
--- Comment #25 from Georg-Johann Lay <gjl at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-14 18:26:07 UTC --- Created attachment 28960 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28960 Don't use STAMP to please Ada (In reply to comment #24) > > What I don't understand is what is bad with Rolf's proposal of defining > > STAMP? > > We simply don't need to stamp anything for the gnattools. Notice $(srcdir)/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in reads: # target overrides ifneq ($(tmake_file),) include $(tmake_file) endif # host overrides ifneq ($(xmake_file),) include $(xmake_file) endif There are other backends like x86 and mips that use STAMP in their t-snip, so I wonder how you can conclude that ada does not include code that might require STAMP? Here is a patch that bypasses the need of STAMP in t-avr. Rolf can test it. PR55243 * config/avr/t-avr: Don't automatically rebuild $(srcdir)/config/avr/t-multilib $(srcdir)/config/avr/avr-tables.opt $(srcdir)/doc/avr-mmcu.texi (avr-mcus): New phony target to build them on request. (s-avr-mlib, s-avr-mmcu-texi): Remove. * avr/avr-mcus.def: Adjust comments.
