http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 23:40:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > > Question is: Is the packing needed here? I would guess that it isn't.
> >
> > Of course I might be wrong here. After all, array_t3_ptr is a pointer, so
> > it's
> > not guaranteed to be contiguous, right?
>
> To answer that myself, I think the packing is indeed needed here.
In fact this is exactly the case of comment 0. So, yes, we definitely need the
packing!
