http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56078
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-24 13:27:55 UTC --- Created attachment 29264 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29264 gcc48-pr56078.patch Patch I've bootstrapped/regtested. It seems in most places constructor_max_index == NULL was treated as unlimited bound (compared to e.g. constructor_max_index being -1 as zero size bound with nothing allowed), but these two spots either didn't handle it at all, or incorrectly. The patch fixes the new testcase, both that it doesn't ICE and behaves expectedly, but unfortunately at the same time regresses gcc.c-torture/compile/20030305-1.c testcase, which is no longer accepted. It was filed as ice-on-invalid, is it really supposed to be a valid GNU C99 testcase?
