http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111



--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2013-01-26 
11:11:24 UTC ---

Ok, I understand. Looks like, however, we are back to my original observation

in PR54112 that in C++03 mode we have less constraints and with more leeway we

could manage to keep on supporting this? I think submitter has a point that

it's weird that we don't support anymore in C++03 mode the very simple and old

kind of code attached here. I have no idea how complex it would be and whether

it's worth it, I would like to ear from the Release managers too.

Reply via email to