http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #20 from Alexander Potapenko <glider at google dot com> 2013-01-30 17:07:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > Well, if somebody does the work and in a clean way that won't penalize targets > with sane linkers and object formats, I'm not objecting, I just am not going > to > spend time on this. If clang can handle ctor priorities right at least inside > of each individual CUs, perhaps those that care about targets which don't > support that in the linker can add similar support to gcc (what I've been > suggesting, if priorities aren't supported by linker, don't emit stuff right > away, but just queue it and at the end sort it and emit. Looks like you're right and the constructors are just being emitted by machopic_asm_out_constructor() in gcc/config/darwin.c, so ASan just has no chance to add his ctor before the default one. I suppose this can be fixed in gcc/config/darwin.c, but we don't have enough knowledge and/or cycles for this. Perhaps the right thing to do is to file a bug against the owner of that file.
