[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

[kcc at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309



--- Comment #26 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-08 
06:31:26 UTC ---

FTR: here is the perf data for zero-based offset (clang)

https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/ZeroBasedShadow#Performance