http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2013-02-16 11:57:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm not opposed to this behavior, but I think it would be a language change. Thanks Jason. I just see now http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1518 Unless I'm mistaken, this is actually the relevant issue. I suggest to defer this issue and mark it with CWG 1518. I'm not sure how this would be best done, so leave it to the administrators of this list.
