http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55611
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-11 15:14:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I also tried the reverse order (just swap x and y in the GET_CODE comparison). > It got a crazy process during stage3 compiling tree-ssa-address.c (I killed it > at 40GB). Seems to be the same problem, at least the call stack looks the same, with IOR instead of PLUS.
