http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56624
--- Comment #2 from Michael Zolotukhin <michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com> 2013-03-15 12:19:50 UTC --- > Can you reproduce a testcase for that instead? It doesn't make sense > to handle code that should be optimized earlier (by DSE). Is it from > code like > > if (cond) > a[i] = 3; > else > a[i] = 3; > > ? Yes, originally it is from the code similar to your example, but this example has one more problem which hides the one described in this tracker. I've submitted one more bug with the test almost like yours (56625).
