http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56700
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-24
11:39:15 UTC ---
> So not optimizing for size during compile leads to worse results than omitting
> lto at all for gcc-4.8
>
> I thought optimizations can be ommitted completely during compile, when doing
> lto.
Absolutely not, where did you get this info from? You should pass the same
optimization options at compile and link stage, the compiler will do the rest.
