http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56725
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-27 17:43:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Hi Manuel. I wanted to actually handle this per your indications and move on, > but I don't understand why you check the return value of permerror: shouldn't > we emit the inform anyway, either for an error or a warning? permerrors can be totally hidden by using "-fpermissive -w" no? (I haven't actually tested it, so maybe I am wrong). If so, it would be weird to give the note.
