http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34940
Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2012-06-29 11:27:01 |2013-03-29
CC| |Joost.VandeVondele at mat
| |dot ethz.ch
Known to fail| |4.9.0
--- Comment #16 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch>
2013-03-29 08:58:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Function is static, that seems OK.
> We inline it with ./xgcc -B ./ -O2 t.f90 -S --param large-stack-frame=2000
>
> We are somewhat stupid here, since the call happens all the time and thus
> stack
> frame growth limits don't need to apply. I can implement this if this is
> common case for fortran. How commonly we run into these io structs?
> We can also bump large stack limits to make fortran I/O to fit in.
>
> Honza
I think it would make sense to implement this, if easy enough. It could be a
common pattern for contained subroutines and private module procedures
