http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56983



             Bug #: 56983

           Summary: Label in asm deleted after call to non-returning

                    function

    Classification: Unclassified

           Product: gcc

           Version: 4.7.2

            Status: UNCONFIRMED

          Severity: normal

          Priority: P3

         Component: c

        AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

        ReportedBy: silvioricar...@gmail.com





gcc -v:

Using built-in specs.

COLLECT_GCC=gcc

COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/4.7/lto-wrapper

Target: i686-linux-gnu

Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro

4.7.2-2ubuntu1' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.7/README.Bugs

--enable-languages=c,c++,go,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr

--program-suffix=-4.7 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id

--with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext

--enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.7

--libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu

--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-gnu-unique-object

--enable-plugin --enable-objc-gc --enable-targets=all --disable-werror

--with-arch-32=i686 --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release

--build=i686-linux-gnu --host=i686-linux-gnu --target=i686-linux-gnu

Thread model: posix

gcc version 4.7.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.2-2ubuntu1) 



uname -a:

Linux silvioricardoc-laptop 3.5.0-27-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 25 20:00:05

UTC 2013 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux



Command-line:

gcc -Wall -Wextra code.c





Description:

GCC eliminates all code following a call to a non-returning function, even if

this code includes an asm label that can be jumped to. In the latter case, it

will generate the "jump-to-label" assembly output, but the code will fail to

link due to the missing label.



The problem may be the fact that GCC does not know when an asm label can be

jumped into, but in this case, the correct solution should be to act

conservatively and keep that part of the code intact.

Reply via email to