http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351
--- Comment #14 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- > In that post (comment 6) I was citing the patch you attached to this report, > which says: > OK that's clear. Wrong attachment.... > like you said. Presumably that attached part should have been applied > instead of your original patch? no, applied patch was OK as approved. > > In any case, from what I understand you reproduced the arm.c ICE and > confirmed that it's fixed with your (under test) ARM patch? yes, correct. Reproduced and fixed with the ARM patch posted in comment #13 pffff, sorry for the confusion.
