http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57035
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Author: burnus Date: Tue May 21 17:27:04 2013 New Revision: 199158 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199158&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-05-21 Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> PR fortran/57035 * intrinsic.c (do_check): Add constraint check for NO_ARG_CHECK, assumed rank and assumed type. * gfortran.texi (NO_ARG_CHECK): Minor wording change, allow PRESENT intrinsic. 2013-05-21 Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> PR fortran/57035 * gfortran.dg/assumed_type_5.f90: New. * gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_1.f90: Comment invalid statement. * gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_2.f90: Ditto. * gfortran.dg/assumed_type_3.f90: Update dg-error. * gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_3.f90: Ditto. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_type_5.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_2.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_type_3.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_3.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/sizeof_2.f90