http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438

--- Comment #12 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ok, new theory.  Does this patch fix it for you:

Index: varasm.c
===================================================================
--- varasm.c    (revision 199270)
+++ varasm.c    (working copy)
@@ -6052,7 +6052,7 @@ default_no_named_section (const char *na
 {
   /* Some object formats don't support named sections at all.  The
      front-end should already have flagged this as an error.  */
-  gcc_unreachable ();
+  gcc_assert (0);
 }

 #ifndef TLS_SECTION_ASM_FLAG

Reply via email to