http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55776
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3)
> But the global foo is a type while myenum::foo is not a type. Is there any
> context where they can be used interchangeably?
>
> enum class myenum
> {
> bar = int
> };
>
> doesn't make sense.
How about this:
typedef int foo;
enum class myenum
{
foo = 1,
bar = (foo)+1
};
What is the value of myenum::bar? Is it clear and unambiguous, or should there
be a warning?
