http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29834
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- You can use list-initialization to workaround it: Doh{x}, ++x;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29834
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- You can use list-initialization to workaround it: Doh{x}, ++x;