http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9) > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:08:18AM +0000, latlon90180+gcc_bugzilla at gmail > dot com wrote: > > Is there any progress on this? > > REAL128 of gfortran4.8 is still 10. > > > > Need a short example. gfortran has supported a 128-bit real type > for quite some time (since 4.6). > > real(4) a > real(8) b > real(10) c > real(16) d > print '(4(I0,1X))', digits(a), digits(b), digits(c), digits(d) > end > > % gfortran46 -o z a.f90 && ./z > 24 53 53 113 > > PS: yes, the output is correct for real(10). FreeBSD-i386's long double > only has 53-bits of precision. Ignore. I should have read the audit trail first.