http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58239
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2013-08-25 CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > OK, I see the emitted reference to 'operator delete', and I suspect I > have an idea of why the compiler generated this reference even though > it isn't used anywhere in the input source code. > > Why are we linking gnatlink with xgcc and not with xg++ -nostdc++? Because we haven't had a real need up to now, IOW we always managed to massage things so as to avoid the dependency. Maybe it's the end of the road...