http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition You odr-use a static member variable, so it must have a definition. The linker error is your fault for not defining the static member, not the library's fault for using a reference parameter. If you add the missing definition the program links: constexpr std::iterator_traits<std::string::iterator>::difference_type A::a; So I have no objection to changing __normal_iterator to take the parameter by value, but taking it by reference is not a bug. It is unspecified whether "it += A::a" is an odr-use or not. Your program will also fail to link if you do this: std::max(A::a, A::a); But clearly we're not going to change std::max, that would be non-conforming.