http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #18) > This is avoided by the following improved patch (which just 'silently' sets > the attributes): That version still yields a good number of testsuite failures, but it seems like most of them are due to invalid code that was not detected previously: FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_decl_9.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_11.f90 -O (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_12.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_15.f90 -O (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_6.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_common_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_2.f90 -O (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_8.f90 -O (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/sizeof_proc.f90 -O (test for excess errors) So for now I'm assuming the patch is fine. I will go through the above list in detail and update the test cases accordingly.
