http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58621

Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Your suggested optimization would be invalid if .LANCHOR0 had the address
0x?????????????FFC, whereupon adding 4 would wrap the offset component but not
the base component in x0.

Reply via email to