http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822
Michi Henning <michi at triodia dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #9 from Michi Henning <michi at triodia dot com> ---
Hmmm... I spoke too soon. I made a simple mistake and tried the test case with
the wrong settings.
I can now reproduce this on another machine (one that has never had any clang
component installed). This is with a brand-new installation of gcc
(4.8.1-10ubuntu8) from the Canonical package archives.
gcc reports:
gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.10-10ubuntu8) 4.8.1
uname reports:
Linux ubuntu 3.11.0-8-generic #15-Ubuntu SMP Fri Sep 20 04:11:26 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I've attached the .ii file, as well as an archive with an even more minimal
test case (one source file, three header files, all trivial).
I'd very much appreciate it if someone could confirm whether this bug is real
or whether I'm seeing ghosts.
Thanks muchly,
Michi.
