http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970

--- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Eric declared negative bitpos to be a nono that the expander is not handling
> well.  Thus, Eric, please chime in here.

Well, that's a basic sanity requirement, all the routines in expmed.c dealing
with bitfields use unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT so, yes, better avoid negative values
unless you really know what you're doing...

Reply via email to