http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59264
--- Comment #5 from Mahesh S <smaheshs41 at gmail dot com> --- [Bug c/59264] Incorrect order of execution on increament/decrement operator But it works correctly in Turbo C and Borland C compiler why not in gcc On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:23 PM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59264 > > Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot > gnu.org > > --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > > but it gets executed correctly for 1st condition why not for 2nd and 3rd > > Both executions are correct since the code has undefined behavior. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >
